Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Cultopedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Debriefing
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===Psychological research=== In [[psychology|psychological research]], a debriefing is a short interview that takes place between researchers and research participants immediately following their participation in a [[Experimental psychology|psychology experiment]]. The debriefing is an important ethical consideration to make sure that participants are fully informed about, and not psychologically or physically harmed in any way by, their experience in an experiment. Along with [[informed consent]], the debriefing is considered to be a fundamental ethical precaution in research involving human beings.<ref>[https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/beta.bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20Conduct%20(2009).pdf Code of Ethics and Conduct, 3.4, 20 from the British Psychological Society] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180307214417/https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/beta.bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20Conduct%20(2009).pdf |date=2018-03-07 }} Retrieved March 7, 2018.</ref> It is especially important in [[social psychology (psychology)|social psychology]] experiments that use deception. Debriefing is typically not used in surveys, observational studies, or other forms of research that involve no deception and minimal risk to participants. Methodological advantages of a debriefing include "the ability of researchers to check the effectiveness of a manipulation, or to identify participants who were able to guess the hypothesis or spot a deception."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Husain|first=Akbar|title=Social Psychology|publisher=Pearson Education|year=2012|isbn=978-81-317-6000-0|location=Delhi|page=71}}</ref> If the data have been compromised in this way, then those participants should be excluded from the analysis. Many psychologists feel that these benefits justify a post-experimental follow-up even in the absence of deception or stressful procedures.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Aronson |first1=E. |last2=Wilson |first2=T. D. |last3=Brewer |first3=M. B. |year=1998 |chapter=Experimentation in social psychology |editor1=D. T. Gilbert |editor2=S. T. Fiske |editor3=G. Lindzey |title=The handbook of social psychology |place=New York, NY |publisher=McGraw Hill }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bps.org.uk/downloadfile.cfm?file_uuid=1B299392-7E96-C67F-D4A092C173979F33&ext=pdf |format=pdf |author=Professional Practice Board Working Party |title=Psychological Debriefing |date=May 2002 |publisher=British Psychological Society |access-date=December 8, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927220523/http://www.bps.org.uk/downloadfile.cfm?file_uuid=1B299392-7E96-C67F-D4A092C173979F33&ext=pdf |archive-date=2007-09-27}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Cultopedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Cultopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Debriefing
(section)
Add topic