Editing Wotansvolk (section)

=== White revolution ===
Desiring a "white revolution", Wotansvolk endorsed the "[[leaderless resistance]]" strategy originally developed by [[Louis Beam]]. Their own version involved the tactical separation between an open propaganda arm and a paramilitary underground. The mission of the overt part was to "counter system-sponsored propaganda", "educate the Folk", and "provide a man pool from which the covert or military arm can be [recruited]."<ref name=":3" /> Predicting that the openly racist propaganda arm would be "under scrutiny", Lane emphasized by 1994 the need for members to "operate within the [legal] parameters" and keep themselves "rigidly separated" from the military underground. The paramilitary wing would have to "operate in small, autonomous cells, the smaller the better, even one man alone", in order for its members to primarily target "weak points in the infrastructure" of industrialized societies with "fire, bombs, guns, terror, disruption, and destruction". Lane added that "whatever and whoever perform valuable service for the system are targets, human or otherwise", and that "special attention and merciless terror are visited upon those White men who commit race treason".<ref name=":3" />

Lane considered loyalty to the United States "race treason", as he viewed the United States as actively committing [[White genocide conspiracy theory|genocide against white people]].{{sfnp|Gardell|2003|p=67}}<ref name="adl">{{cite web|url=http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/lane.asp?xpicked=2&item=lane|title=David Lane |website=[[Anti-Defamation League]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081103094309/http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/lane.asp?xpicked=2&item=lane |archive-date=November 3, 2008}}</ref> 

While Wotansvolk followers have endorsed the white separatist project of the [[Northwest Territorial Imperative]], they mostly dismissed the constitution of the [[white ethnostate]] proposed by [[Aryan Nations]] in April 1996 on the ground that it restricted liberties, especially the [[freedom of religion]].{{sfnp|Gardell|2003|pp=112–113}}