Editing Creativity (religion) (section)

===Racial socialism===
The Southern Poverty Law Center classifies Creativity as a [[Neo-Nazism|neo-Nazi]] [[ideology]].<ref name=SPLC>{{cite web |title=The Creativity Movement |url=http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/the-creativity-movement-0 |work=splcenter.org |publisher=Southern Poverty Law Center |access-date=March 19, 2012 |archive-date=May 8, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150508010542/http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/the-creativity-movement-0 |url-status=dead }}</ref> According to Klassen, Creativity is not a rehash of [[Nazism]]; as evidence of this fact, he listed eight differences which exist between the two political ideologies.<ref>{{cite book |title=Little White Book |author=Ben Klassen |date=1991 |publisher=Church of the Creator |chapter=13. Creativity Unique}}</ref> He adopted the phrase "racial socialism" to describe his political ideology. Klassen was critical of [[democracy]] and advocated [[meritocracy]], believing that effective leaders should rule. Under racial socialism, "whites would work together toward common goals but without the massive economic planning in the style of the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Gosplan]]".<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite book |last=Michael |first=George |title=Theology of Hate: a History of the World Church of the Creator |publisher=University Press of Florida |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-8130-3350-1}}{{Page needed|date=January 2011}}</ref> He supported a limited [[market economy]], believing that social and economic activities should be in the best interests of white people. Klassen criticized "leftist proclivities" to recruit from the white working class: "All [white] members of the national or racial community ... had an important role to play."<ref name="ReferenceA"/>

Klassen urged members of Creativity to "work feverishly and aggressively to organize politically, to distribute literature on behalf of the White Race, to promote and foster White solidarity, and to get control of the government and the political machinery of the state by legal means if possible. If this is not possible by legal means, then we must resort to the same means as our forefathers used two hundred years ago to defend their liberty, their property, their homes and their families."{{citation needed|date=February 2017}}