Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Cultopedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Anti-cult movement
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Europe === In the [[European Union]], the [[European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism|FECRIS]] ({{Lang|fr|Fédération Européenne des Centres de Recherche et d'Information sur le Sectarisme, English: European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Sectarianism}}) organization has been active since 1994 as an [[Umbrella organization|umbrella]] for European organizations investigating the activities of groups labeled to be cults or sects.<ref>{{Cite book |url=http://www.hrwf.net/images/reports/2012/2012fecrisbook.pdf |title=Freedom of Religion or Belief, Anti-Sect Movements and State Neutrality, A Case Study: FECRIS |publisher=Religion – Staat – Gesellschaft, Journal for the Study of Beliefs and Worldviews |year=2012 |isbn=978-3-643-99894-1 |editor-last=Besier |editor-first=Gerhard |publication-place=Berlin |pages=183–189 |language=en |issn=1438-955X |editor-last2=Seiwert |editor-first2=Hubert |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200528205709/http://www.hrwf.net/images/reports/2012/2012fecrisbook.pdf |archive-date=2020-05-28}}</ref> The European Coordination for Freedom of Conscience, a participating organization in the EU Fundamental Rights Platform, issued a report on FECRIS in 2014, describing the differences between how the organization describes itself and what its key figures actually do and say. It summarized that "activities of FECRIS constitute a contravention of the principles of respect and tolerance of beliefs... [and] is in direct opposition to the principles of the [[European Convention on Human Rights]] and other international human rights instruments."<ref>{{Cite web |date=2014-09-17 |title=Question about a European "NGO" FECRIS {{!}} CAP Freedom of Conscience |url=https://freedomofconscience.eu/2014-04-question-about-the-fecris/ |access-date=2023-04-10 |publisher=European Coordination of Associations and Individuals for Freedom of Conscience |language=en-US}}</ref> ==== France ==== {{See also|About–Picard law|MIVILUDES|Centre contre les manipulations mentales|Parliamentary Commission on Cults in France}} Anti-cult organizations in France have included the [[Centre Roger Ikor]] (1981–) and MILS ([[Mission interministérielle de lutte contre les sectes]]; English: "Interministerial Mission in the Fight Against [[Cult]]s"), operational from 7 October 1998. [[MIVILUDES]], established in 2002, subsumed some of their operations. MIVILUDES has been criticized for the broad scope of its list of cults, which included both non-religious organizations and criteria for inclusion which [[Bishop]] [[Jean Vernette]], the national secretary of the French episcopate to the study of cults and [[new religious movement]]s, said could be applied to almost all religions.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Williams |first=Elizabeth |date=2020-05-04 |title=An In-depth Look at the Negative Impact of the French Anti-Cult Movement |url=https://curiousmindmagazine.com/an-indepth-look-at-the-negative-impact-of-the-french-anti-cult-movement/ |access-date=2022-08-14 |magazine=Curious Mind Magazine |language=en-US}}</ref> MIVILUDES officials are under the French [[Minister of the Interior (France)|Ministry of the Interior]] as of January 2020.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kheniche |first=Ouafia |date=2019-10-01 |title=Lutte contre les sectes : la Miviludes va disparaître |url=https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/exclusif-lutte-contre-les-sectes-la-miviludes-va-disparaitre-2513982 |access-date=2022-08-14 |work=France Inter |language=fr}}</ref> The [[About-Picard law]] against sects and cultic influence that "undermine [[human rights]] and [[fundamental freedoms]]" as well as [[mental manipulation]] was established in 2001.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hensley |first=Jon |date=2000-06-22 |title=Church attacks new French anti-cult law |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/jun/23/jonhenley |access-date=2022-08-12 |work=[[The Guardian]] |language=en-GB}}</ref> ==== United Kingdom ==== {{See also|The Family Survival Trust|Cult Information Centre|Reachout Trust}} In the UK, [[Member of Parliament (United Kingdom)|MP]] [[Paul Rose (British politician)|Paul Rose]] established the first major British anti-cult group called [[The Family Survival Trust|FAIR]] (Family Action Information and Rescue/Resource) in 1976.<ref name=":4" /> In 1987, [[Ian Haworth]] founded the [[Cult Information Centre]].<ref>Elisabeth Arweck. "Anti-Cult Movement: FAIR, Cult Information Centre (CIC)." In ''Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements'', edited by [[Peter B. Clarke]], 35–37. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. 37.</ref> Other groups like [[Deo Gloria Trust]], [[Reachout Trust]], [[Graham Baldwin|Catalyst]], [[People's Organised Workshop on Ersatz Religion]], and [[Cultists Anonymous]] also grew during the 1970s and 1980s.<ref>[[The Family Survival Trust|Casey McCann]]. "The British Anti-Cult Movement... A View From Within." ''[[Journal of Contemporary Religion]]'' 3, no. 2 (1986): 6–8.</ref><ref name=":4">George D. Chryssides. "Britain's Anti-cult movement." In ''New Religious Movements: Changes and Responses'', edited by Jamie Cresswell and Bryan Wilson, 257–273. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.</ref><ref name=":0" /> In 1968, after a large movement from the public to investigate Scientology's effects on the health and well-being of its adherents, [[Minister of Health (United Kingdom)|Minister of Health]] [[Kenneth Robinson (British politician)|Kenneth Robinson]] implemented measures to prevent the immigration of foreign and [[British Commonwealth|Commonwealth]] Scientologists into the United Kingdom.<ref>John A. Robilliard. ''Religion and the Law: Religious Liberty in Modern English Law.'' Manchester and Dover, NH: Manchester University Press, 1984. 106–109.</ref><ref>Richardson and van Driel, "New Religious Movements in Europe," 154.</ref> One measure was the automatic denial of [[student visa]] applications for foreign nationals seeking to study at Hubbard College at [[East Grinstead]] or any other Scientological educational institution. Additionally, [[work permit]]s to foreign nationals seeking employment in Scientology establishments were restricted.<ref>Eileen Barker, "The British Right to Discriminate," ''[[Society (journal)|Society]]'' 21, no. 4 (1984): 35–41 [38–39].</ref><ref>Richardson and Van Driel, "New Religious Movements in Europe: Developments and Reactions," 154.</ref> These measures were lifted in 1980 after a [[Foster Report|1971 investigation]] headed by [[John Foster (MP for Northwich)|John G. Foster]] believed that the "Scientology ban" was unfair.<ref>{{Cite report |url=https://ia803209.us.archive.org/1/items/FosterReportEnquiryIntoThePracticeAndEffectsOfScientology/Foster%20Report%20-%20Enquiry%20into%20the%20Practice%20and%20Effects%20of%20Scientology.pdf |first=John |last=Foster |author-link=John Foster (MP for Northwich) | title = Enquiry into the Practice and Effects of Scientology | publisher = [[Her Majesty's Stationery Office]], London | date = December 1971}} UK National Archive piece reference [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=8070954&CATLN=6&accessmethod=5&j=1 MH 153/606]. ([https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Cowen/audit/fosthome.html alternative html version])</ref> Despite this investigation, the [[European Court of Justice]] ruled that the United Kingdom was entitled to refuse the right of entry to nationals of [[European Union]] [[member state]]s seeking employment in Scientology establishments.<ref name=":9">Barker, "British Right to Discriminate," 39.</ref> Sociologist [[Eileen Barker]] believes that three reasons led to the lifting of the "ban": (1) it was unenforceable, (2) it was hard to defend before the [[European Court of Human Rights]], and (3) it was unfair since it was the only new religious movement that received such treatment.<ref name=":9" /> In 1999, the Church of Scientology attempted to obtain charitable status through the [[Charity Commission for England and Wales|Charity Commission of England and Wales]], but their application was rejected and the Church did not appeal the decision.<ref name=":5">Johnathan Benthall. "Scientology's Winning Streak." ''Anthropology Weekly'' 30, no. 1 (2014): 3–4.</ref> In 2013, the [[Supreme Court of the United Kingdom|UK Supreme Court]] ruled that the [[Scientology in the United Kingdom|Scientology chapel in London]] was a "place of meeting for religious worship" that could be registered as a place of marriage to the [[General Register Office|Registrar General of Births, Deaths and Marriages]].<ref name=":5" /> ==== Austria ==== In Austria, the anti-cult movement is represented by GSK ({{Lang|de|Gesellschaft gegen Sekten und Kultgefahren}}), renamed in 1992 from the Association for Mental Health ({{Lang|de|Verein zur Wahrung der geistigen Freiheit}}), founded by psychologist Brigitte Rollett on September 29, 1977, engaged in an information campaign against religious minorities and new religious movements.<ref name=":03">{{Cite web |date=2016-11-27 |title=AUSTRIA: GSK: Is the FECRIS-branch of Austria becoming a shadow of itself? |work=Human Rights Without Frontiers |url=http://hrwf.eu/austria-gsk-is-the-fecris-branch-of-austria-becoming-a-shadow-of-itself/ |access-date=2023-04-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161127221729/http://hrwf.eu/austria-gsk-is-the-fecris-branch-of-austria-becoming-a-shadow-of-itself/ |archive-date=27 November 2016}}</ref> GSK is a declared member of FECRIS.<ref name=":10">{{Cite web |date=2015-08-15 |title=Members |website=FECRIS |url=http://www.fecris.org/members/ |access-date=2023-04-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150815230029/http://www.fecris.org/members/ |archive-date=15 August 2015}}</ref> Between 1992 and 2008, GSK was funded by the state government of the city of Vienna.<ref name=":03" /> According to the HRWF report, further financing from the funds of the state government of Lower Austria is non-transparent.<ref name=":03" /> ==== Czech Republic ==== The Society for the Study of Sects and New Religious Direction ({{Lang|cs|Společnost pro studium sekt a nových náboženských směrů}}), which is considered by religionists to be an anti-cult movement, has been operating in the [[Czech Republic]] since 1993.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2009-08-03 |title=NOVÁ NÁBOŽENSKÁ HNUTÍ |url=http://www.oleweb.net/nnh/hnuti.htm |access-date=2023-04-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090803003332/http://www.oleweb.net/nnh/hnuti.htm |archive-date=3 August 2009}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Nová náboženská hnutí (stručný úvod) [nová náboženská hnutí, sekty, nová religiozita] |url=http://www.david-zbiral.cz/NNHuvod.htm#_Toc151661446 |access-date=2023-04-09 |website=www.david-zbiral.cz}}</ref> ==== Finland ==== In Finland from 1993 operates organisation U.U.T. ({{Lang|fi|Uskontojen uhrien tuki}}), Support Group for the Victims of Religions, which is a FECRIS member.<ref name=":10" />
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Cultopedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Cultopedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Anti-cult movement
(section)
Add topic